Anonymous Hacker Served With Restraining Order Via Nft

Regulation corporations Holland & Knight and Bluestone have served a defendant in a hacking case with a short lived restraining order by way of a nonfungible token, marking the primary recognized authorized course of to be facilitated by an NFT.

The so-called “service token” or “service NFT” was served to an unnamed defendant in a hacking case involving LCX, a Liechtenstein-based cryptocurrency alternate that was hacked in January for nearly $8 million. As Cointelegraph reported on the time, the assault compromised the platform’s scorching wallets, ensuing within the lack of Ether (ETH), USD Coin (USDC) and different cryptocurrencies.

Holland & Knight has develop into the primary legislation agency to serve a defendant by #NFT, which was created and airdropped by our #AssetRecovery Workforce. Be taught extra from our consumer @LCX. #crypto #blockchain #legalinnovation

— Holland & Knight (@Holland_Knight) June 8, 2022

LCX reported on June 7 that roughly 60% of the stolen funds at the moment are frozen with investigations presently underway in Liechtenstein, Eire, Spain and the USA. Roughly $1.3 million in USDC was frozen by Centre Consortium, a company based by USDC issuer Circle and crypto alternate Coinbase, based mostly on a court docket order from the New York Supreme Court docket.

Associated: Optimism loses 20M tokens after L1 and L2 confusion exploited

LCX mentioned the funds have been laundered through crypto mixer Twister Money however have been later traced by way of “algorithmic forensic evaluation.” The evaluation additionally allowed the corporate to determine the hacker wallets.

You have been served! #subpoena
About 1 hour in the past, @LCX’s legal professionals served a “Service NFT” to a topic tackle. Approx. 1.3M $USDC frozen on chain.

Extra particulars and assertion by LCX might be printed inside 24h.

Service NFT

— Monty Metzger (@montymetzger) June 7, 2022

In gentle of those findings, Holland & Knight and Bluestone, the legislation corporations representing LCX, served the nameless defendant with a short lived restraining order that was issued on-chain utilizing an NFT. This methodology “was authorized by the New York Supreme Court docket and is an instance of how innovation can present legitimacy and transparency to a market that some imagine is ungovernable,” LCX mentioned.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.